Business architecture is still a nascent discipline, and hence the business architecture tools and techniques are evolving as well. What business architecture tools and techniques to use in your work depends on the scope of your enterprise business architecture undertaking as well as the purpose and outcomes you are striving to achieve. How to communicate architecture – Technical Architecture Modeling at SAP. This blog is the result of the very positive feedback I received after my presentation about architecture modeling at SAP TechEd 2007. It is the first of a series of blog posts about architecture modeling, giving an introduction and overview of TAM, SAP’s internal modeling standard.
Initiated in 1989, one of the earliest frameworks for.An enterprise architecture framework ( EA framework) defines how to create and use an. An provides principles and practices for creating and using the architecture description of a system.
It structures architects' thinking by dividing the architecture description into domains, layers, or views, and offers models - typically matrices and diagrams - for documenting each view. This allows for making systemic design decisions on all the components of the system and making long-term decisions around new design requirements, sustainability, and support. Contents.Overview Enterprise architecture regards the enterprise as a large and complex system. To manage the scale and complexity of this system, an architectural framework provides tools and approaches that help architects abstract from the level of detail at which builders work, to bring enterprise design tasks into focus and produce valuable architecture description documentation.The components of an architecture framework provide structured guidance that is divided into three main areas:. Descriptions of architecture: how to document the enterprise as a system, from several viewpoints. Each view describes one slice of the architecture; it includes those entities and relationships that address particular concerns of interest to particular stakeholders; it may take the form of a list, a table, a diagram, or a higher level of composite of such. Methods for designing architecture: processes that architects follow.
Usually, an overarching enterprise architecture process, composed of phases, broken into lower-level processes composed of finer grained activities. A process is defined by its objectives, inputs, phases (steps or activities) and outputs. It may be supported by approaches, techniques, tools, principles, rules, and practices. Organization of architects: guidance on the team structure and the governance of the team, including the skills, experience, and training needed.History. Overview of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks evolution (1987–2003). On the left: The 1987, 1989, 1992, 1997, 1999 and 2000. On the right: influenced by, JTA, JTAA, 1995, DoD TRM and 1996, and 2003.The earliest rudiments of the step-wise planning methodology currently advocated by TOGAF and other EA frameworks can be traced back to the article of Marshall K.
Evans and Lou R. Hague titled 'Master Plan for Information Systems' published in 1962 in Harvard Business Review.Since the 1970s people working in IS/IT have looked for ways to engage business people – to enable business roles and processes - and to influence investment in business information systems and technologies – with a view to the wide and long term benefits of the enterprise. Example of the, which has defined five architectural layers.For many years, it has been common to regard the architecture domains as layers, with the idea that each layer contains components that execute processes and offer services to the layer above.
Enterprise architecture reference architecture with sub domainsThe application and technology domains (not to be confused with business domains) are characterized by domain capabilities and domain services. The capabilities are supported by the services. The application services are also referred to in (SOA). The technical services are typically supported by software products.The data view starts with the data classes which can be decomposed into data subjects which can be further decomposed into data entities. The basic data model type which is most commonly used is called merda (master entity relationship diagrams assessment, see ). The Class, subject and entity forms a hierarchical view of data. Enterprises may have millions of instances of data entities.The Enterprise Architecture Reference Traditional Model offers a clear distinction between the architecture domains (business, information/data, application/integration and technical/infrastructure).
These domains can be further divided into Sub domain disciplines. An example of the EA domain and subdomains is in the image on the right.Many enterprise architecture teams consist of Individuals with Skills aligned with the Enterprise Architecture Domains and sub-domain disciplines.
Here are some examples: enterprise business architect, enterprise documentational architect, enterprise application architect, enterprise infrastructure architect, enterprise information architect, etc.An example of the list of reference architecture patterns in the application and information architecture domains are available at.View model. Illustration of the.A is a framework that defines the set of views or approaches used in, or the construction of an.Since the early 1990s, there have been a number of efforts to define standard approaches for describing and analyzing system architectures. Many of the recent Enterprise Architecture frameworks have some kind of set of views defined, but these sets are not always called view models.Standardization Perhaps the best-known standard in the field of and started life as, an for describing the architecture of a software-intensive system approved in 2000.In its latest version, the standard is published as. Just a few of the Enterprise Architecture frameworks utilized today, 2011Nowadays there are now countless EA frameworks, many more than in the following listing.Consortia-developed frameworks. ARCON – A Reference Architecture for Collaborative Networks – not focused on a single enterprise but rather on networks of enterprises.
(GERAM). – the Reference Model of Open Distributed Processing (ITU-T Rec. The Chief Information Officers Council (1999). 2012-02-13 at the. September 1999.
SearchCIO. The Open Group (2008) TOGAF Version 9. Van Haren Publishing, 1 nov. 73. ^ Stephen Marley (2003).
At Webarchive.org, retrieved 3-04-2015. (2004) How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks. P.89 gives a similar scheme. US Department of Defense (2001). 9 April 2001. 11, mentioned that also the DoD TRM is influenced by POSIX.
Evans, M. And Hague, L.
(1962) Master Plan for Information Systems, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 92-103. Kotusev, Svyatoslav (2018) The Practice of Enterprise Architecture: A Modern Approach to Business and IT Alignment. Melbourne, Australia: SK Publishing. ^ Graham Berrisford (2008-13) ' on grahamberrisford.com, last update. Accessed.
(1982) Business Systems Planning and Business Information Control Study: A comparison in IBM Systems Journal 21(1). P32. ^ (1987). A Framework for Information Systems Architecture.
In: IBM Systems Journal, vol 26, no 3. IBM Publication G321-5298. ^ Zachman and Sowa (1992) Extending and formalising the framework of information systems architecture IBM Systems Journal, Vol 31, No 3. ^ Svyatoslav Kotusev (2016). The History of Enterprise Architecture: An Evidence-Based Review.
In: Journal of Enterprise Architecture, vol. Rigdon (1989). Architectures and Standards.
In Information Management Directions: The Integration Challenge (NIST Special Publication 500-167), E.N. Goldfine (Eds.), Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), pp.135-150. Richardson, G.L.; Jackson, B.M.; Dickson, G.W.
'A Principles-Based Enterprise Architecture: Lessons from Texaco and Star Enterprise'. MIS Quarterly. 14 (4): 385–403., and ( (2006) Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business Review Press. The Open Group (2011).
Accessed July 16, 2013. The Open Group (2011).
Accessed July 16, 2013. TOGAF 9.1 White Paper An Introduction to TOGAF Version 9.1. Niles E Hewlett (2006), 2007-05-08 at the. PMP CEA, Enterprise Architecture Team, USDA-OCIO.
January 25, 2006. 2010-07-05 at the.
Whitehouse.gov May 2005. (2011). In: Common Defense Quarterly.
January 2011, p. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh, Collaborative Networks: Reference Modeling, Springer, 2008. Camarinha-Matos, L.M.; Afsarmanesh, H. 'On reference models for collaborative networked organizations'. International Journal Production Research. 46 (9): 2453–2469.
Software Architecture Tools
2011-04-24 at the. Gianni, Daniele; Lindman, Niklas; Fuchs, Joachim; Suzic, Robert (2012). 'Introducing the European Space Agency Architectural Framework for Space-Based Systems of Systems Engineering'. Complex Systems Design & Management. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Complex Systems Design & Management CSDM 2011. Pp. 335–346. US Department of the Treasury Chief Information Officer Council (2000).
2009-03-18 at the. Version 1, July 2000. Pragmatic EA.
Architecture Design Tool
Tony Shan and Winnie Hua (2006). Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC 2006), October 2006, p23-32.External links. (July 2016).